SALT LAKE CITY — It seems like a west-aspect cut up from Salt Lake County will not be occurring anytime quickly.
HB93, born from an undercurrent of frustrations from some elected officials on Salt Lake County’s west aspect, failed on a 29-40 vote in the Utah House of Representatives on Friday.
The vote to shoot down the bill got here despite the bill sponsor’s efforts to symbolize a constituency that has grow to be fed up with feeling unrepresented by Salt Lake County authorities.
“There’s a disenfranchisement that is palpable in elements of my county,” stated Rep. Kim Coleman, R-West Jordan.
There’s been no formal name from councils and mayors from cities together with Herriman, Riverton, West Jordan and Copperton, however a handful of elected leaders from those communities turned to Coleman to create an choice in state code if their cities have been to ever need a “divorce” from Salt Lake County.
Frustrations with the county come after what elected leaders from the world say have been quite a lot of issues, together with discontent over how money for transportation or different tasks has been distributed — seemingly to favor the east aspect.
Herriman residents have been additionally outraged when the Salt Lake County Council final yr accepted the 930-acre, 8,800-unit Olympia Hills improvement, leading former Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams to veto the venture. Some west-aspect native leaders additionally opposed a $58 million gross sales tax hike to pay for transportation tasks, but the county enacted the tax after sufficient city councils — mostly on the east aspect — voted to help it.
While the invoice was spurred by Salt Lake County considerations, some leaders in San Juan County started eyeing the bill after last yr’s election when the County Commission saw its first Native American majority elected, regardless that Navajos barely outnumber white populations in the county. A decide realigned the commission’s district strains after discovering gerrymandering favored white residents.
“This bill has literally been a journey,” Coleman stated, noting she took a visit to San Juan County to take enter for the invoice.
The bill was confronted with a number of considerations in an earlier House committee but still passed out favorably. On the Home flooring, Coleman unveiled an extended record of modifications she stated would tackle considerations, including requiring a feasibility research for each a new county and the county being left behind earlier than a potential cut up might go to the ballot.
Rep. Patrice Arent, D-Salt Lake Metropolis, tried to block the modified bill, protesting sweeping modifications on the Home flooring.
“I actually reject this course of of adjusting the bill so dramatically on the floor,” Arent stated.
Nonetheless, the Home adopted the bill substitute, however it was nonetheless met with opposition from some of Coleman’s fellow Republicans.
Rep. Jeff Stenquist, R-Draper, stated a county cut up can be “very unwell-suggested” and he wasn’t positive that the method laid out in Coleman’s bill can be one of the best…